Job Boards Revisited 2
(Jan 27, 2009) The job boards are often maligned, mismanaged and misunderstood. Several recent tidbits create an opportunity for a review. The December Comscore rankings tell a big story. Monster’s database was hacked again. The questions about the value of job boards are increasingly loud (see here and here)
This table (from Comscore) is the first leg of the story.
Total Unique Visitors (000)
Dec-2007 Dec-2008 % Change
Total Internet : Total Audience 183,619 190,650 4
Job Search 12,445 18,826 51
CareerBuilder.com Job Search 5,132 9,121 78
Yahoo! HotJobs Job Search 2,282 5,605 146
Indeed.com Job Search 2,712 5,106 88
Monster.com Job Search 4,131 3,776 -9
Simply Hired, Inc. 1,188 3,104 161
JOB.COM Job Search 731 1,237 69
MSN Careers by CareerBuilder.com
Job Search 593 1,004 69
AOL Find a Job by CareerBuilder.com
Job Search 504 856 70
Jobs.net Job Search 350 368 5
Jobster.com Job Search 186 365 97
Here are the key takeaways:
- The job search category grew by 51% year over year.
- Meanwhile, the overall American Internet Audiece grew 4%
- Job Search was far and away the fastest growing category.
- Monster’s market share decreased by 9% while the category showed spectacular traffic growth.
- Indeed and SimplyHired have exploded on to the scene with traffic growth around 150%
- Properties controlled by CareerBuilder were responsible for half of the growth in traffic.
- Relative newcomers Indeed and Simply hired accounted for most of the rest of category growth.
There is much to be learned about the job board business. Jobster, after years of looking for traction, is starting to pop up in the rankings. The job board business is a difficult, insiders game. If you don’t know the market and the customers, you are at a disadvantage. Jobster learned this expensively. Monster’s new management is absorbing the same lessons in a very public way. At about $9/share, MWW is trading near a 10 year low.
Built on old fashioned newspaper models, the job board industry is cyclical in a weird sort of way. Traffic goes up whenever the advertising inventory goes down. People want to hunt for job information when they need jobs. That’s exactly when there are fewer listings (and lower revenues) on the job boards.
The result is a perpetuation of the perception problems that the newspapers always had. Employers viewed job advertising in newspaers as a primary source of hires. Job hunters never saw it as such. Both views were precisely true.
When job hunters flocked to read the relatively empty listings in a down cycle, it pumped up newspaper circulation revenues (which suffered from a simultaneous shortfall in display advertising.) Having classified advertising was good for the newspapers even when it wasn’t good for the audience.
Online job board companies have to build without this cyclical counterbalance.
Next: Monster’s fumbles spell trouble for the industry.
I’m on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Friendfeed. Catch up with me.









